Nestle and American Home Products Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

cuddle and American Home Products - Essay Example nest and American Home Products (AHP) had exercised corporate social responsibility (CSR) by distributing free samples of baby linguistic rule to famine-stricken children and those who could non be breastfed. On the one hand, Nestle and AHP were of the opinion that their free donations of the infant formula did non bollocks up the World Health Organization (WHO) code, which outlaws the distribution of free samples of the product to attract sales. On the other hand, critics such as Action for Corporate Accountability, and Infant Formula Action Coalition (INFACT) pointed out that the body linguistic process used by the food processors did not point to any effort aimed at encouraging breastfeeding on board the use of the infant formula, especially in third-world countries. Nestles marketing strategies of enhancing the quantity of free samples of the infant formula to counter breastfeeding campaigns gave it away as an organizat ion that did not care about CSR. This is a perfect field of corporate bodies prioritizing their profit-making strategies instead of the moral responsibility, especially where millions of young, innocent lives are in danger. Question 4 Nestles CSR as viewed from a narrow perspective depicts the picture of a corporation that had and thus showed some moral responsibility by saving millions of poor children in third-world countries from famine with its free samples of infant formula. In light of this, the dressing code for Nestle marketers tasked to distribute the product to consumers, and the lack of adequate instruction on the need to use the product to complement breastfeeding does not seem to attract any qualms. However, a wider perspective of the companys... Nestle and American Home ProductsAccording to Shaw (2010), all corporations all companies are anticipate to return some of their business gains back to the society as a show of moral responsibility. Nestle and American Hom e Products (AHP) had exercised corporate social responsibility (CSR) by distributing free samples of infant formula to famine-stricken children and those who could not be breastfed. On the one hand, Nestle and AHP were of the opinion that their free donations of the infant formula did not spite the World Health Organization (WHO) code, which outlaws the distribution of free samples of the product to attract sales. On the other hand, critics such as Action for Corporate Accountability, and Infant Formula Action Coalition (INFACT) pointed out that the body terminology used by the food processors did not point to any effort aimed at encouraging breastfeeding alongside the use of the infant formula, especially in third-world countries. Nestls marketing strategies of enhancing the quantity of free samples of the infant formula to counter breastfeeding campaigns gave it away as an organization that did not care about CSR. This is a classic case of corporate bodies prioritizing their pro fit-making strategies instead of the moral responsibility, especially where millions of young, innocent lives are in danger. At the inception of the infant formula, Nestls conduct seems to be moral in the sense that the product was a favorable plectron for infants who could not be fed on breast milk.